“We’re not saying it’s not an injury to the brain. It may be. We do know, for sure, that it’s an injury to the ear and that the brain is affected. (…) These tests that we did cannot be faked.”
Dr. Michael E. Hoffer — Lead author of the report
“We have measurable, quantifiable evidence that something really did happen to the patients. It’s not just hysteria.”
Dr. Carey Balaban

On September 7 2018, SMA (US Department of Defense Strategic Multilayer Assessment) hosted a speaker session presented by Dr. Michael Hoffer (University of Miami), Dr. James Giordano (Georgetown University), Dr. Carey Balaban (University of Pittsburgh), and Dr. Diane DiEuliis (National Defense University) as a part of its SMA General Speaker Series.
In part I of this series, I presented the conclusions of Dr Hoffer in a short documentary using both his PowerPoint slides and his presentation of these slides during the teleconference. In part II, you heard the conclusions of Dr. James Giordano (Georgetown University). In part III, we learned why Dr Carey D. Balaban (University of Pittsburgh) believes that the diplomats have been attacked by a neuro-weapon.
In the final post of this series, Dr Diane DiEuliis concludes the presentation by discussing how neuro-weapons present a diverse threat to a range of potential targets, and argues that neuro-weapons should be treated as “weapons of mass disruption.”
I hope that this series will make it clear that, whatever the cause, these diplomats have suffered real injuries. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY Continue reading →