“The competing messages, according to officials in attendance, also reflect cultural differences between the FBI and the CIA. The bureau, true to its law enforcement roots, wants facts and tangible evidence to prove something beyond all reasonable doubt. The CIA is more comfortable drawing inferences from behavior.”
The Washington Post

April 12 2020. Thank God, it is Sunday. I hope you are well. Today, we could use a joke and what could be a better subject than John Brennan himself?
On May 23 2017, Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy asked former CIA director John Brennan what evidence he had provided to the FBI to catalyze its investigation of Trump-Russia collusion. Brennan replied: “I really don’t do evidence.”
Then, on Monday March 25 2019, a day after Attorney General William Barr released a summary of Mueller’s findings showing there was no evidence Trump or anyone close to him colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election, Brennan admitted he may have gotten it wrong. “I don’t know if I received bad information, but I think I suspected there was more than there actually was,” Brennan told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”
There is no doubt in my mind that Brennan should be investigated for the role he played in the Russiagate hoax. But this is Sunday and, for now, let me tell you an old joke about John Brennan and James Comey. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY Continue reading →