Four Years Ago — Russiagate Intel Report Suspiciously Anachronistic

“The newly-released intelligence report describing Russia’s efforts to undermine the US election is a brick short of a load.”

General Michael Hayden — Former head of the CIA and National Security Agency (January 7 2017)


January 8 2017 — The report, released Friday (January 6 2017), outlines how Russian President Vladimir Putin aimed to hurt Hillary Clinton and help President-elect Donald Trump by using by “an influence campaign” which included hacking Democratic groups and figures.  The ’25-page’ Intel Report per se is in fact 5 pages long and the document contains 7 pages of information related to the 2012 US election! Follow us on Twitter: @Intel_Today

RELATED NEWS: CIA Accusations are Unproven, Dangerous and Beyond Hypocrisy

RELATED NEWS: Bernard Bajolet: DGSE Warned French Government of Trump Victory in December 2015!

RELATED NEWS: ‘Russia Hacking’: The Facts about Obama’s Warning Message to Putin

“The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness.”

Pierre-Simon Laplace (1749–1827)

UPDATE (January 8 2021) — Time flies when you are having fun. It is hard to believe that it has been four years already since this ICA was put out.

But, we are making some progress…

Better late than never. One newspaper has finally published a correct story regarding the FBI’s 2016 investigation into the Trump campaign and Russia.

In a piece titled “The FBI’s Bad Intelligence”, the Wall Street Journal (September 26 2020) finally concludes what was obvious long ago.

Four years into accusations about Russia-Trump collusion, we finally learn that Russia’s main conduit for disinformation may have been America’s FBI.

Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz last year revealed that former spook Christopher Steele relied on one primary “subsource” for most of his accusations against the Trump campaign. This subsource was later identified as Ukrainian-born Igor Danchenko, who worked as a research analyst from 2005 to 2010 at the Brookings Institution in Washington. The latest disclosures show that Mr. Danchenko was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011, based on concerns he was a Russian agent and “a threat to national security.”

Here’s the kicker: The FBI identified Mr. Danchenko as Mr. Steele’s source in December 2016, when senior bureau officials also became aware of the prior FBI investigation. The FBI’s realization that it was being fed potential Russian disinformation should have put an immediate halt to the Page probe, if not the entire collusion investigation.

Instead and incredibly, the FBI failed to disclose this information to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in all three of its subsequent renewal applications against Mr. Page.

Ernest Hemingway used to describe the FBI as an American version of the German GESTAPO. Once more, the old man was not wrong…


“All of this underscores that the great scandal of 2016 wasn’t Russian collusion. It was the unleashing of America’s premier law enforcement agency against a presidential campaign based on Russian disinformation midwifed and financed by the Clinton campaign. The public is finally getting the truth about the FBI’s malfeasance, and Messrs. Barr and Durham deserve credit for exposing it.”

Wall Street Journal (September 26 2020)

CNN’s Michael Smerconish — who expressed frustration that the presented evidence was heavily classified — told Michael Hayden, a former head of the CIA and National Security Agency, the report left him “wanting more.”

Hayden said he “had the same sense of disappointment,” and recognized that the newly-released intelligence report describing Russia’s efforts to undermine the US election was “a brick short of a load.”

From the NYT

“Soon after leaving the meeting, intelligence officials released the declassified, damning report that described the sophisticated cybercampaign as part of a continuing Russian effort to weaken the United States government and its democratic institutions.

The report — a virtually unheard-of, real-time revelation by the American intelligence agencies that undermined the legitimacy of the president who is about to direct them — made the case that Mr. Trump was the favored candidate of Mr. Putin.

The 25-page report did not conclude that Russian involvement tipped the election to Mr. Trump.”

25 Pages. Really?

How many pages does the ’25 page’ Intel Report actually contain? The answer to this ‘tricky question’ is: Five. That is right. The document begins with a cover page, table of content, summary, blank page, title page…

But the report per se runs from page 11 to page 15. Two annexes are included to fill the document. Annex A runs from page 16 to 22. Annex B is printed on page 23. The next page is blank and page 25 is the back cover of the document.

If you don’t know what this means, ask any College teacher who has served on PhD thesis Committees for a long time. When a student fills his PhD presentation with irrelevant information and annexes to make it look more impressive, University professors know — before reading a single sentence — that the main part of the thesis is going to be ‘thin’ on substance.


And thus, it is no surprise that 5-page report does not provide one bit of evidence that Russian Intelligence Services have hacked the election.

There is worse: Annex A is actually anachronistic. This document was written in December 2012, after the victory of Mr Obama.

A footnote on page 16 (first page of Annex A: Kremlin’s TV Seeks To Influence Politics, Fuel Discontent in US) reads:

“This annex was originally published on 11 December 2012 by the Open Source Center, now the Open Source Enterprise.”

The inclusion of ‘Annex A’ in the ‘Intel Report’ is grossly misleading and highly suspicious.

Individuals added to the OFAC SDN List

On 29 December 2016, OFAC (the US Office of Foreign Assets Control ) has updated the ‘Specially Designated Nationals List’ to include four members of the GRU and two hackers.

The four GRU individuals are the Head of the agency and three of his Deputy Chiefs.

The two hackers are:

BELAN, Aleksey Alekseyevich (a.k.a. Abyr Valgov; a.k.a. BELAN, Aleksei; a.k.a. BELAN, Aleksey Alexseyevich; a.k.a. BELAN, Alexsei; a.k.a. BELAN, Alexsey; a.k.a. “Abyrvaig”; a.k.a. “Abyrvalg”; a.k.a. “Anthony Anthony”; a.k.a. “Fedyunya”; a.k.a. “M4G”; a.k.a. “Mag”; a.k.a. “Mage”; a.k.a. “Magg”; a.k.a. “Moy.Yawik”; a.k.a. “Mrmagister”), 21 Karyakina St., Apartment 205, Krasnodar, Russia; DOB 27 Jun 1987; POB Riga, Latvia; nationality Latvia; Passport RU0313455106 (Russia); alt. Passport 0307609477 (Russia) (individual) [CYBER2].

BOGACHEV, Evgeniy Mikhaylovich (a.k.a. BOGACHEV, Evgeniy Mikhailovich; a.k.a. “Lastik”; a.k.a. “lucky12345”; a.k.a. “Monstr”; a.k.a. “Pollingsoon”; a.k.a. “Slavik”), Lermontova Str., 120-101, Anapa, Russia; DOB 28 Oct 1983 (individual) [CYBER2].

Aleksei Belan is on the FBI WANTED list since September 2012. Evgeniy Bogachev was indicted under the nickname “lucky12345” by a federal grand jury in the District of Nebraska on charges of Conspiracy to Participate in Racketeering Activity in August 2012.

There is no reason to believe that these two individuals work for the Russian State, let alone that they participated in the DNC alleged hacking. (Update — There is now circumstantial evidence linking Evgeniy Bogachev — or at least the ZeuS virus — to the Russian Security Services.)

Hayden: Putin hack intel ‘brick short of a load’

UPDATE (January 8 2019) — When I wrote this post two years ago, it was not known what information the Dutch Intel Agencies had provided to the US IC and why these two cyber-criminals ( Belan Aleksei and Evgeniy Bogachev) were listed by the OFAC?

We now know that, since 2009, FSB agents have been visiting the Netherlands, where they have also been meeting with officials of the FBI and Dutch police officers.

The first criminal the Dutch police, the FBI and the Russians tried to track down was the Russian hacker Evgeniy Bogachev involved in the ZeuS trojan horse malware.

The hacker — who was initially only known by his aliases (like Lucky12345, Monstr, Slavik, IOO, Pollingsoon, and Nu11) — was identified as Evgeniy Mikhailovich Bogachev (born October 28, 1983) in 2014 during the Operation Tovar.

A year prior to his identification, the investigators noticed that the ZeuS virus was no longer used for the sole purpose of stealing money.

The virus was also used to find out very specific information about government officials of Russia’s neighbours.

The Dutch police and the FBI became convinced that Bogachev had been flipped and was now working for the Russian intelligence services.

FSB Colonel Sergei Mikhailov was the most important Russian contact for the Dutch police during this operation.

Colonel Mikhailov was arrested in early December 2016 on charge of high treason.

RELATED POST: Inside the Intrigue of ‘Russia’s Cyberattacks’

According to Russian press reports, Mikhailov and Kaspersky expert Ruslan Stojanov have passed classified information to a US intelligence agency.

UPDATE (January 8 2020) — On May 23, 2017, when testifying before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, former CIA director John Brennan categorically denied that the US Intelligence Community relied on the infamous Steele dossier for the Intelligence Community Assessment report on Russiagate.

Here is the full exchange with former Rep. Trey Gowdy:

Mr. Gowdy: Do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier?

Mr. Brennan: I don’t.

Mr. Gowdy: Did the CIA rely on it?

Mr. Brennan: No.

Mr. Gowdy: Why not?

Mr. Brennan: Because we — we didn’t. It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community assessment that was done.

Inspector General investigators asked former FBI Director James Comey if he remembered discussions with Brennan on presenting the dossier to Obama.

Comey said Brennan argued it was “important” enough to include in the ICA — clearly part of the “corpus of intelligence information” they had. [Page 179 of the IG report]

John H. Durham has requested John Brennan’s emails, call logs and other documents from the CIA.Durham wants to learn what Mr. Brennan told other officials, including the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, about his and the C.I.A.’s views of a notorious dossier of assertions about Russia and Trump associates.

In an interview broadcast on Fox News, Attorney General William P. Barr stated that “He [Durham] is looking at other agencies.”

Calling it a “much broader investigation,” Mr. Barr added, “He is looking at all the conduct — both before and after the election.”

Durham’s investigators also want to know more about the discussions that prompted intelligence community leaders to include Mr. Steele’s allegations in the appendix of their assessment.


Hayden: Intelligence report a ‘brick short of a load’ — CNN

Putin Led a Complex Cyberattack Scheme to Aid Trump, Report Finds — NYT 6 January 2017


One Year Ago — Intel Report Suspiciously Anachronistic

Two Years Ago — Russiagate Intel Report Suspiciously Anachronistic

Three Years Ago — Russiagate Intel Report Suspiciously Anachronistic

Four Years Ago — Russiagate Intel Report Suspiciously Anachronistic

This entry was posted in CIA, CIA Director, DNC & Podesta Leaks, FBI, GRU, Michael Hayden, NSA, Putin, Russia, Trump and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s