Wikipedia : A Disinformation Operation? [Swiss Propaganda Research]

“Truth is the daughter of time, not of authority.”

Francis Bacon

“This story is demented and broken on so many levels, it is quite difficult to know where to begin, even. Here we have an excellent Wikipedia administrator who has been victimized by lunatic conspiracy theorists, a private person who has absolutely no relation to the wild stories that this article promulgates. Slashdot, you have been trolled.”

Jimmy Wales — Wikipedia co-founder (July 26 2007)

“I cannot confirm that the traffic you cite came from agency computers.”

CIA Spokesperson (August 15 2007)

“A nuclear scientist and reporter Ludwig De Braeckeleer suggested that intelligence agents may have been infiltrated Wikipedia to remove undesirable information from Wikipedia articles The design and application of WikiScanner technology proved such suspicions to be well founded”

Internet Brigades in Wikipedia — Wikipedia

“The strange thing about this story is that this was proven to be true. And there was no denying it. Then later on, a few people started to deny it and claim that it was merely a rumor. Wikipedia has no excuse to hide this.”

Anonymous [Wikipedia user Blissyu2]

March 19 2020 — The Swiss Propaganda Research Group (SPR), founded in 2016, is an independent non-profit research group investigating geopolitical propaganda in Swiss and international media. In their last published work, SPR warns that Wikipedia is anything but an open, transparent and reliable source of information. This story brings back quite a bit of memories. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY

RELATED POST: On This Day — Wikipedia Is Born. And The Spooks Love It! (January 15 2001) [2020]

On July 26 2007, I published a piece regarding suspicious edits made to some articles on Wikipedia. I came to the conclusion that Western Intelligence Agencies were editing sensitive information on Wikipedia.

The piece received quite a bit of attention. The article posted on OMNI was accessed by more than 100,000 readers, reposted and translated in several languages.

The story has been debated on many website. I particularly enjoyed the piece of a Russian journalist, writing for Computerra Magazine. (The article – Spies in Wikipedia – could be accessed in English.)

Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia administrators reacted angrily to the story. “This article is just wild speculative nonsense,” Jimmy Wales wrote.

On August 17 2007, I published a second story in which I listed the CIA edits to Wikipedia pages.

On March 1st 2020, the Swiss Propaganda Research Group (SPR) — an independent nonprofit research group investigating geopolitical propaganda in Swiss and international media — published a story titled: “Wikipedia: A Disinformation Operation?

The story makes reference to my origin article as well as three additional following pieces, including my recent comment regarding the 133,612 edits made in the name of “Philip Cross” in recent years.

Today, and for the future, the “Authority” of Jimmy Whales  and his insults — He never apologized to me — matter very little. Truth is indeed the daughter of time!

PS — Just one comment about this new piece by the SPR Group. It was my work that prompted Reuters to write an article on this affair, not the other way around, as you can easily check from the publication dates.

Wikipedia : A Disinformation Operation?

Swiss Propaganda Research

Wikipedia is generally thought of as an open, transparent, and mostly reliable online encyclopedia. Yet upon closer inspection, this turns out not to be the case.

In fact, the English Wikipedia with its 9 billion worldwide page views per month is governed by just 500 active administrators, whose real identity in many cases remains unknown.

Moreover, studies have shown that 80% of all Wikipedia content is written by just 1% of all Wikipedia editors, which again amounts to just a few hundred mostly unknown people.

Obviously, such a non-transparent and hierarchical structure is susceptible to corruption and manipulation, the notorious “paid editors” hired by corporations being just one example.

Indeed, already in 2007, researchers found that CIA and FBI employees were editing Wikipedia articles on controversial topics including the Iraq war and the Guantanamo military prison. [Reuters (August 17 2007)]

Also in 2007, researchers found that one of the most active and influential English Wikipedia administrators, called “Slim Virgin”, was in fact a former British intelligence informer. [OhMyNews (July 27 2007)]

More recently, another highly prolific Wikipedia editor going by the false name of “Philip Cross” turned out to be linked to UK intelligence as well as several mainstream media journalists. [Intel Today (June 2 2018)]

In Germany, one of the most aggressive Wikipedia editors was exposed, after a two-year legal battle, as a political operative formerly serving in the Israeli army as a foreign volunteer.

Even in Switzerland, unidentified government employees were caught whitewashing Wikipedia entries about the Swiss secret service just prior to a public referendum about the agency.

Many of these Wikipedia personae are editing articles almost all day and every day, indicating that they are either highly dedicated individuals, or in fact, operated by a group of people.

In addition, articles edited by these personae cannot easily be revised, since the above-mentioned administrators can always revert changes or simply block disagreeing users altogether.

The primary goal of these covert campaigns appears to be pushing Western and Israeli government positions while destroying the reputation of independent journalists and politicians.

Articles most affected by this kind of manipulation include political, geopolitical and certain historical topics as well as biographies of non-conformist academics, journalists, and politicians.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, a friend of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and a “Young Leader” of the Davos forum, has repeatedly defended these operations.

Speaking of Davos, Wikimedia has itself amassed a fortune of more than $160 million, donated in large part not by lazy students, but by major US corporations and influential foundations.

Moreover, US social media and video platforms are increasingly referring to Wikipedia to frame or combat “controversial” topics. The revelations discussed above may perhaps help explain why.

Already NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed how spooks manipulate online debates, and more recently, a senior Twitter executive turned out to be a British Army “psyops” officer.

To add at least some degree of transparency, German researchers have developed a free web browser tool called WikiWho that lets readers color code just who edited what in Wikipedia.

In many cases, the result looks as discomforting as one might expect.

REFERENCES

Wikipedia: A Disinformation Operation? — Swiss Propaganda Research

CIA, FBI computers used for Wikipedia edits  — Reuters (August 17 2007)

Wikipedia and the Intelligence Services — OhMyNews (July 27 2007)

Шпионы в стране Wikipedia — (Computerra Magazine, 2007, archived)

Spies in Wikipedia (Computerra Magazine, 2007, archived)

What we know about SlimVirgin (Wikipedia Review, 2007, archived)

Wikipedia and the Spooks – The Remake? —  Intel Today (June 2 2018)

The Mystery Wikipedia Editor Targeting Anti-War Sites (ML, 2018)

Wikipedia: Rotten to the Core (Helen Buyniski, 2018)

Time to ditch Wikipedia? (Five Filters Analysis, 2018)

Wikipedia Editing Scandal Continues (Neil Clark, 2019)

=

Wikipedia : A Disinformation Operation? [Swiss Propaganda Research]

This entry was posted in WIKIPEDIA and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Wikipedia : A Disinformation Operation? [Swiss Propaganda Research]

  1. Anti Defecation League Of B'bull 'B'shit says:

    I came here after being banned from Wikipedia for having merely posted a comment in on a “talk” page (apparently “talk” does not mean talk about things that anonymous admnistrators and their sycophants don’t want to talk about) regarding the attempted coup d’etat in Venezuela. A user had questioned the decision to remove the appropriately descriptive word “coup’ from any reference in the article, replacing it with some bland Newspeak term intended to conceal, rather than reveal information. My comment was immediately, within a few hours at least, removed and my account banned for life under the pretext that a) I was a troll (someone took offense at the moniker “Anti Defecation League” which I had chosen (referring to the bullshit that Wikipedia is, and not, you know, to a certain quasi-fascistic privately-organized intelligence agency that works hand-in-glove with cops to track leftists in the US) and acting “in bad faith.” Both of which are a-priori violations of what are represented as being Wiki’s core principles of assumed good faith and not to blame the user/bearer of the bad thoughts.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Guaira_naval_attack
    I just thought to put this here since it seems also relevant to note that the fellow who first exposed the CIA/WIKIPEDIA links, Vergil Griffin, is again facing 20 years in prison for “unrelated” charges.
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia/cia-fbi-computers-used-for-wikipedia-edits-idUSN1642896020070816

    It should be noted that (a) the Kept Media seem to be engaged in obscuring his role in outing the CIA/Intelligence community’s manipulation of Wikipedia and (b) that the giving a speech in North Korea about electronic-based coinage didn’t seem to hamper the career or freedoms of Basketball Diplomat Dennis Rodman:

    https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/12/17453080/dennis-rodman-potcoin-bitcoin-donald-trump-kim-jong-un-north-korea

    Like

  2. L says:

    Dear Sir, I will be very busy over the next 10 weeks, but I will take the time to make a very important point. Virgil Griffith began his work because of my story! Not the other way around. Look at the dates very carefully. I think he admitted that he took him 2 weeks to write his ‘Wikipedia’ program. And he posted his work about 2 weeks after I published my piece. I never understood why he lied about that. But I don’t care. Best, L

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s