Havana Syndrome — Pesticide may have caused diplomats’ illness. Really? [UPDATE : Better than the Crickets’ Theory but still implausible]

“We report the clinical, imaging and biochemical evidence consistent with the hypothesis of over-exposure to cholinesterase inhibitors as the cause of brain injury.”

Canadian Study (September 2019)

“It took us many months to get to this conclusion, and there is lots of research to be done still, but this is the beginning of an answer to what happened, we think. There is a lot we don’t know about how much we can expose people to these chemicals and what are toxic levels, or if the damage in the brain is reversible. But it’s not called a neurotoxin for nothing. The hint is in the name.”

Dr. Alon Friedman — Professor of neuroscience at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia

“Do the results known to me fully support that the signs / symptoms occurring in US embassy personnel were solely due to cholinergic neurotoxicity? No, not completely.”

James Giordano PhD — Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry Georgetown University — Email to Intel Today (September 20 2019)

September 25 2019 — According to a new study commissioned by the Canadian government, fumigation against mosquitoes may have caused Canadian diplomats — and family members — to fall ill. Neither the diplomats nor the federal government consider the just-released report from Dalhousie University’s Brain Repair Centre as a conclusive answer. I am sceptical. On one hand,  the Dalhousie report confirms that Canadian diplomats suffered brain injuries while posted in Havana. But in many ways, it brings more questions than answers. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY

RELATED POST: Havana Syndrome — “Embassy Encephalopathy: Induced Hearing Loss, Cognitive Dysfunction and Neuropathological Changes – Possible Causes, Mechanisms, and Effects” by Dr. James Giordano (Georgetown University)

RELATED POST: One Year Ago — Havana Syndrome : Neuro Weapons Behind Cuba Attacks? U.S. Intel Agencies Suspect Russia

RELATED POST: Havana Syndrome — TIMELINE [UPDATE – October 2018]

RELATED POST: Havana Syndrome — UCSD Researcher Links Diplomats’ Mystery Illness to Microwave Radiation — UPDATE — NYT : “Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers”

RELATED POST: Havana Syndrome & Microwave Weapons: Q&A with Professor James Lin [UPDATE 3]

UPDATE (October 2 2019) — Several persons have contacted me regarding this post and I can state that not a single one of them believes that overexposure to pesticides caused the diplomats’ illness.

People point out, as I did, that this theory fails to explain why the pesticide only hurts the North American diplomats and not the Cubans?

A Havana neighborhood being fumigated as a part of the fight against mosquitos carrying Zika virus in 2016.

Some authors are already suggesting that the Cuban population may be immune due to genetics. I do not believe this hypothesis for a second.

Moreover, there is an additional point to be made, as two readers of this blog suggest.

Surely, one could argue that Cuban authorities have indeed detected a health problem but that they are covering up the news.

It is certainly plausible. All governments lie and I do not expect Cuba to be an exception.

However, there are also hundreds of thousands of tourists from all over the world and there is no record of any of them falling ill with Havana syndrome.

[Estimated number of tourists in Cuba: 4 million in 2016, 4.7 million in 2017, 4.75 million in 2018, and over 5 million in 2019.]

How do you explain that? Please, keep in mind that the researchers involved in this new study were able to test several of the diplomats before and after their visit to Cuba and they noticed changes in the brains of those who had just spent a few weeks in Havana.

According to Chinese official media, “the findings refute the claim of a deliberate attack against the diplomats.”

The statement is simply false.  But it is not really surprising that Chinese officials — and others — are eager to accept that hypothesis as the truth of what happened to these diplomats in Havana.

END of UPDATE

The Canadian study was conducted by a team of researchers affiliated with the Brain Repair Centre at Dalhousie University and the Nova Scotia Health Authority.

The researchers have detected brain damages in an area that causes symptoms reported by the diplomats.

They concluded that cholinesterase — a key enzyme required for the proper functioning of the nervous system — was being blocked in that area.

During the 2016-2018 period (when diplomats became ill), normal fumigation in Cuba was stepped up due to the Zika epidemic in the Caribbean. Some pesticides work by inhibiting cholinesterase.

“While the source of exposure to toxins of the cholinesterase inhibitor family is not yet confirmed in our study, the use of insecticides readily and evidentially suggests itself.

Importantly, certain chemical classes of pesticides, such as organophosphates and carbamates, work against insects by inhibiting the action of cholinesterase, but can also be poisonous to humans.”

Mass-spectrometry tests have detected the presence of cholinesterase-inhibiting insecticides, including Temephos, an organophosphorus that is used in Cuba to fight mosquitoes. The tests also found 3-phenoxybenzoic acid, a common insecticidal metabolite.

The research — funded by Global Affairs Canada — has not yet been published as it is undergoing the peer review process.

Exploring all avenues

Intel Today has long argued that the mass hysteria theory made no sense whatsoever.

Those who argue in favor of this explanation are insulting both the victims and our intelligence.

Cindy Calkin — a psychiatrist and member of the multidisciplinary research team — categorically rejects the idea of mass hysteria.

“I have interviewed all but one or two of the victims and I haven’t found any evidence of psychiatric disorder.

This is a very strong group, very resilient and there is no evidence of mass hysteria.

Part of the diagnostic of mass hysteria is that there is no underlying other medical cause that can be found.

And we found underlying medical evidence.”

In an email to CBC/Radio-Canada, spokesperson John Babcock said that Global Affairs Canada hasn’t definitively determined a cause to the mysterious ailments at this point.

“While we are exploring all avenues, including the research at Dalhousie, no definitive cause of the health incidents has been identified to date,” he said.

Please, keep in mind that in contrast to previous reports on American diplomats, most Canadians did not describe an acute, directional, unusual sensory and/or auditory stimulus.

Still, it would be an extraordinary coincidence if US and Canadian diplomats began to experience similar symptoms at the same time and the same place but for different reasons.

Opinion from an expert

Dr James Giordano — Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry Georgetown University Medical Center Washington, DC, USA — has researched the possible cause of the Havana Syndrome.

In the video posted below, Dr. Giordano provides an in-depth overview of the possible vectors for the otopathologic (ear-damaging) effects these individuals experienced, as well as the potential mechanisms and causes for such effects. [This video is based on a conference held on September 7 2018.]

I asked Professor James Giordano his views regarding this new study. Here is his answer.

As you may recall, one of the possibilities we considered upon first reviewing this case was exposure to some neuro-pharmacologic / toxic agent.

At that time, the possibilities included cisplatin, certain diuretics, salicylates, and cholinergics/anticholinesterases.

Serial exposure to low/moderate doses of cholinergic pesticides could produce a cascade of neurological features that are similar to some of those observed in the affected individuals.

My understanding is that there are some differences between US and Canadian personnel in the pattern of signs/symptoms and possible exposures

An important consideration would be whether metabolites of such compounds were retrieved from body fluid/tissue samples, and what were the time-courses of both retrieval and predicted exposure(s).

Is it possible that some individuals were exposed to cholinesterase inhibitors? Yes. indeed

Could this have been accidental exposure. Yes, indeed. Could this have been intentional exposure? Yes, indeed.

Do the results known to me fully support that the signs/symptoms occurring in US embassy personnel were solely due to cholinergic neurotoxicity? No, not completely.

Reaction from the diplomats

For the 15 diplomats and their families, the study is a new source of frustration.

“The report does not make any clear findings regarding the cause of Havana syndrome, instead only raising the ‘hypothesis’ of overexposure to insecticides as a ‘plausible’ cause.”

“The Canadian diplomats feel profoundly betrayed by the Canadian government. Canadian diplomats and their families deserve better.

Not only did Canada put them in harm’s way, but it is now re-victimizing them by failing to properly investigate and identify the actual cause of their injuries, by failing to provide them and their families with proper medical treatment and by failing to accept responsibility for the diplomats and their families who have been so severely injured while serving their country.”

Intel Today

The theory has of course a major flaw… Why would only a limited number of Canadian and American diplomats be affected given that insecticides were deployed aggressively throughout Havana beginning in 2016 to fight the mosquito-born Zika virus?

Moreover, we have been told that most US diplomats affected by this mysterious illness were in fact intelligence officers. How could neurotoxins differentiate between real diplomats and spooks?

PS — Please, notice how many months it took for the researchers to identify this neurotoxin and contrast this investigation with the Skripals’ story where Novichok was identified in a matter of hours.

“Embassy Encephalopathy”: Induced Hearing Loss, Cognitive Dysfunction and Neuropathological Changes — Possible Causes, Mechanisms, and Effects

James Giordano PhD — Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry Georgetown University Medical Center Washington, DC, USA

REFERENCES

Cuba ‘sonic attack’ might be connected to insecticide intended to fight Zika, study says — CNN Health

UPDATE

A Look at Evolution as “Havana syndrome” Linked to Pesticides – The Great Courses Daily

Israeli researchers crack mystery of ‘Havana syndrome’ — Israel 21c

=

Havana Syndrome — Pesticide may have caused diplomats’ illness. Really?  [Comments from Dr James Giordano]

Havana Syndrome — Pesticide may have caused diplomats’ illness. Really?  [UPDATE : Better than the Crickets’ Theory but still implausible]

This entry was posted in Havana Syndrome and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Havana Syndrome — Pesticide may have caused diplomats’ illness. Really? [UPDATE : Better than the Crickets’ Theory but still implausible]

  1. Fergus Kane says:

    Mass hysteria is not insulting, or at all an indication that people are weak. I treat plenty of very very ‘strong’ and impressive people with panic attacks. A panic attack is basically an individual version of mass hysteria, in which otherwise innocuous bodily symptoms are attributed a catastrophic interpretation.

    If working with these diplomats, I found that one of them suffered from panic attacks (quite likely given the prevalence of panic attacks), would I be insulting them? Of course not. Indeed this suggestion simply perpetrates the myth that only weak people can have mental health problems.

    Now of course I’m not able to say whether or not these people are experiencing a mass hysteria or not. From the news reports, the diagnosis would fit, but obviously I’m not in contact with these people and can not and should not attribute a diagnosis.

    As for the point about the two groups suffering from a similar but different set of symptoms at the same time. This is exactly what we would expect, if the cause was psychosomatic and the two groups were separate, but in contact with each other.

    Lastly, my background is in brain imaging and I’d like to point out that the brain imaging research conducted on this sample is very very bad science. I can elaborate further if you are interested.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s