“No one acts alone without orders in the FBI. We had clear goals which were clearly given to us in every document we received from anyone. If a police organization wished for us to provide them ‘proof’ of guilt, then they told us in many ways of their absolute belief that the perpetrators were those individuals they had already arrested. If the president of the United States tells the country in the national news that Dandeny Munoz Mosquera is one of the most feared assassins in the history of the world, then every agent knows that he must provide information to support that statement. If leaders decide without concern for foundation of truth then most people will follow them.”
Fred Whitehurst — Former FBI Chemist (Email to Intel Today)
November 27 2020 — Avianca Airlines Flight 203 was a Colombian domestic passenger flight from El Dorado International Airport in Bogotá to Alfonso Bonilla Aragón International Airport in Cali. Avianca Flight 203 crashed over the municipality of Soacha on November 27, 1989. Allegedly, the plane was destroyed by a bomb. This explanation is however much disputed by experts today. Colombian journalists Pablo Correa, Sergio Silva and retired US Newton Center attorney Thomas Hoffman share the 2017 Simon Bolivar Prize (Category: Investigative journalism) for their outstanding work on the true story of AVIANCA Flight 203. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY
“The conviction was not just based on identification evidence. It is the preponderance of the evidence that led to the conviction.”
Richard Marquise — Chief of the FBI’s Lockerbie task force from 1988 to 1992
November 26 2020 — On November 24, a third appeal on behalf of the Libyan man convicted of the 1988 Lockerbie bombing began at the High Court in Edinburgh. The appeal was conducted via video link. The first day was utterly boring. Nothing happened whatsoever. The second day was even worse. On the third and final day, Advocate Depute Ronny Clancy QC argued against granting the appeal. The five judges will now retire in private and produce a written submission as soon as practicable. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY
“The true revolutionary is guided by a great feeling of love. It is impossible to think of a genuine revolutionary lacking this quality.”
“The only passion that guides me is for the truth… I look at everything from this point of view.”
Che Guevara (June 14, 1928 – October 9, 1967)
A 1960 photo taken by Alberto Korda of Guevara in a beret became iconic and has since appeared on countless posters and T-shirts.
October 9 2020 — On this day in 1967, socialist revolutionary and guerrilla leader Che Guevara was killed by the Bolivian army. He was 39. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY
“A couple of people at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence would have to go, absolutely. Probably Gina Haspel would have to go, too. Gina is a good woman, but she would have to go.”
Michael Hayden — Former CIA and NSA Director General
OCTOBER 26 2020 — According to rumors, CIA Director Gina Haspel (64) intends to step down and retire after the 2020 US election. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY
“Now you come to me and you say ‘Don Corleone, give me justice’, but you don’t even ask with respect. You don’t offer friendship. You don’t even think to call me Godfather.” The Godfather.
Aamer Anwar — Lawyer for the Megrahi’s family
November 25 2020 — A third appeal on behalf of the Libyan man convicted of the 1988 Lockerbie bombing has started at the High Court in Edinburgh. The appeal is being conducted via video link and is expected to last several days with a decision to be delivered at a later date. The first day was utterly boring. Nothing happened whatsoever. The second day was even worse. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY
Lockerbie — Three Decades of Lies: J’Accuse…!
QUICK NOTES — To make it easier for the readers to retrieve various chapters of my book, I have created a special page “Lockerbie” where all the links to the chapters will be listed with a brief description. You can access that page directly as it appears at the far right of the top bar of this blog.
On March 11 2020, the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission [SCCRC] decided to refer the Lockerbie case back to the High Court of Justiciary for determination. As a result of the Commission’s decision, Mr. Megrahi’s family was therefore entitled to instruct an appeal against his conviction. The first procedural hearing took place on Friday August 21 2020. The Appeal date is set to November 24 2020.
“This trial is odder than usual, as it’s a totally virtual courtroom. The 5 judges are the in separate rooms from each other, the defence team are in a meeting room in Glasgow, and most of the reporters are following on an audio feed.“
Court reporter James Doleman — Tweeter(Nov 25 2020)
Day 2 (November 25 2020)
10.45 — Proceedings begin.
Claire Mitchell QC continues her submissions on behalf of the defence, as she is going through the details of various identification evidence.
Mitchell notes that the original Court ruled the identification evidence was “resemblance identification.”
“The circumstances in which that dock identification was made was highly prejudicial.
The identification was made shortly after he had seen a photograph which he had of course seen before, of an article suggesting that Mr Megrahi may have been the bomber and the court will know that the photograph itself,
I think the wording of it is who planted the Lockerbie bomb and underneath there is a photograph of the appellant (Megrahi).
So I would respectfully submit that in this case the dock identification is virtually of no value.“
Ms Mitchell said that evidence in relation to identification was of “poor quality” and said that photographs could not give an idea of someone’s build and height.
11.50 — The court takes a short break.
12.15 — Proceedings resume.
Claire Mitchell QC is ending her submission on the identification evidence against the appellant.
Mitchell concludes: “This evidence cannot support the weight of a conviction.”
She asks the court to set aside the previous verdict.
14.40 — The court takes a break.
15.00 — Gordon Jackson QC rises to present the next defence submissions in the case.
Jackson says his issue is one of disclosure, documents that, he says, should have been given to the defence before the first trial.
On occasions, the “Crown have missed that point entirely,” he says.
The first document Jackson’s raises quotes a witness against Al-Megrahi was “frustrated,” at not being financially compensated for his evidence.
The disclosure of this document, Jackson says, would have led to other documents in which the witness was said to have, ‘shown interest in getting money’.
According to another document:
‘The issue of financial remuneration has not been discussed with witnesses. They understood this could not be discussed while the case was live.”
However Jackson notes that:
“Everyone and their auntie knew there would be a reward from the Americans.”
Counsel says this shows an “expectation that the money was on the horizon.”
Jackson says that the Crown cannot decide in hindsight that a particular piece of evidence would have had no effect on a jury.
Jackson argues that possession of the document would have allowed the defence to challenge the credibility of the identification witness.
“I simply cannot understand the suggestion that if you had actual evidence of a financial interest defence counsel wouldn’t have used it.
It would have changed the dynamic of the situation… It would have been another world.”
16.00 — Jackson ends his submission.
Advocate Depute Ronny Clancy QC begins his response on behalf of the Crown.
“Appellant has not met the statutory tests required to quash the conviction,” Clancy tells the court.
16.15 — Court rises. Proceedings to resume at 10.30 tomorrow.
“After 6 years of work, in the virtual court today we closed our submissions in the posthumous appeal of Al-Megrahi for the Lockerbie bombing nearly 32 years ago.”Aamer Anwar (Nov. 25 2020)
Intel Today Analysis
Megrahi is clearly NOT the mysterious purchaser of the clothes ‘found’ in the primary suitcase. But does it matter to the case?
According to the 2020 SCCRC statement:
“A miscarriage of justice may have occurred because no reasonable trial court, relying on the evidence led at trial, could have held the case against Mr Megrahi was proved beyond reasonable doubt.”
Thirteen years after the first review, the SCCRC reached the same conclusion based on the same analysis of the very same irrefutable facts: the date of the purchase and the identity of the purchaser.
So, does it matter that Megrahi was, or not, the purchaser of the clothes in Malta?
“All there is left to decide is whether Megrahi bought the infamous clothes from Tony Gauci in Malta. This is about as relevant to the Lockerbie Case as knowing if Megrahi had tea or coffee for breakfast in the morning of December 21st 1988.” Intel Today (Nov 21 2020)
According to the SCCRC two reports (2007 & 2020), the identity of the purchaser is a critical part of the guilty verdict.
If the judges had not concluded that Megrahi bought the clothes in Gauci’s shop, he may not have been convicted.
However… Pay attention to the words of the SCCRC 2020 report: “relying on the evidence led at trial”.
It seems that the SCCRC has already been paving the way for the Crown to reveal new evidence against Megrahi that could not have been disclosed 20 years ago.
Did you ever wonder who decided to leak the CIA Minerva files [About CIA interception of Libyan diplomatic cables] earlier this year? And why?
I expect that the judges will unanimously uphold the guilty verdict. In the end, this appeal will do more harm than good.
“If some double agent told the KGB the Americans were alert to Line X and were interfering with their collection by subverting, if not sabotaging, the effort, I believed the United States still could not lose. The Soviets, being a suspicious lot, would be likely to question and reject everything Line X collected. If so, this would be a rarity in the world of espionage, an operation that would succeed even if compromised. Casey liked the proposal.”
Gus W. Weiss
November 25 2020 — Dr Gus W. Weiss was a White House policy adviser on technology, intelligence and economic affair and worked primarily on national security, intelligence and concerns on technology transfer to communist countries. Weiss died on November 25, 2003 under what the UK newspaper The Independent has characterized as “mysterious circumstances”. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY
“It’s interesting the lack of interest in a case relating to what, is still, the worst terrorist attack in British history. I suppose it feels like ancient history now, and we live in the age of Covid, but still surprising given the huge debate at the time”
Court reporter James Doleman (Nov 24 2020)
November 24 2020 — A third appeal on behalf of the Libyan man convicted of the 1988 Lockerbie bombing has started at the High Court in Edinburgh. The appeal is being conducted via video link and is expected to last several days with a decision to be delivered at a later date. The first day was utterly boring. Nothing happened whatsoever. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY
“Johnny Micheal Spann led one of our teams into Afghanistan, then under the sway of a dictatorship aligned with global murder. There, he tracked the authors and allies of terror. There, while fighting for the future of the American people, he fought to bring a better future to the Afghan people. And it was there, one evening, that he said he would gladly risk his life if he could help make the world a safer place for his wife and children. As we know, those were much more than words. Our battle with terrorism will be long and difficult. But those who have taken Mike from us cannot prevail. And they will not. Not while a single decent person—who not only loves liberty, but is ready to protect it—stands against them.”
Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet (May 31 2002)
“IN HONOR OF THOSE MEMBERS OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES IN THE SERVICE OF THEIR COUNTRY”
November 25 2020 — Currently, there are 135 stars carved into the marble of the CIA Memorial Wall: 91 are unclassified. Who are those men and (at least 11) women? When did they die? Why are they honoured by a star? Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY
“Nobody reading this could have any doubt about what the editors of the New York Times expect of candidates for this post. Objective, balanced coverage of Russian realities is clearly not a priority. The chosen correspondent is to look at Russia in negative terms, as on the one hand a powerful and dangerous threat, and as on the other hand (somewhat paradoxically) a weak and decaying nation, undermined by a collapsing economy and corrupt government. This is the current ‘story’, and the lucky person who gets the job will be expected to follow it.”
Professor Paul Robinson — University of Ottawa
November 22 2020 — The New York Times has an opening for a new Russia correspondent as Andy Higgins becomes their new Eastern Europe Bureau Chief. The job description makes it very clear what is expected from the successful candidate. Fluency in Russian is not necessary. Negativity is all that is required. The New York Times’s advertisement makes that absolutely clear. Follow us on Twitter: @Intel_Today
