“There would be no place to hide. If this government ever became a tyranny… the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back.”

Senator Frank Church
(1975)

July 24, 2025 — In 1975, the Church Committee exposed two decades of covert abuses by U.S. intelligence agencies. Half a century later, 2025 is shaping up to be a sequel few expected—and no one dares to name. With newly declassified documents from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, a Justice Department probe, and mounting claims that the intelligence community manipulated the 2016 election narrative for political ends, Washington is once again reckoning with the power of the spy apparatus at home.

Back then, it was wiretaps, blackmail, assassinations, and secret wars. Today, it’s the weaponization of intelligence—FISA warrants, cyber surveillance, and information warfare. Once again, the trust between citizens and the “deep state” is fractured. The tools have changed, but the questions are hauntingly familiar: Who holds the intelligence agencies accountable? And once again, we the people are forced to ask: Who watches the watchers? Follow us on X (formerly Twitter): @Intel_Today

RELATED POST : 1975: The Year of Intelligence [What the Church and Pike Investigations Revealed — and Why Their Warnings Still Matter]

Fifty years later, those same questions have resurfaced—more urgent, more complex, and more digitally entangled than ever before.

Once again, the intelligence community finds itself at the center of controversy, this time not over coups or covert wars, but over the alleged politicization of information, surveillance of domestic political figures, and manipulation of public perception.

At the heart of the current storm is the claim that intelligence tools originally designed to protect the republic were turned inward—used not merely to detect threats, but to shape electoral narratives, sway media coverage, and target political opponents.

Declassified documents released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), alongside a Justice Department investigation into potential FISA abuses, have reignited a national debate over the proper boundaries of intelligence power in a democratic society.

The parallels are striking. Then it was the CIA’s operations in Chile and the FBI’s COINTELPRO program; now it is questions about FISA warrants, cyber surveillance, and the weaponization of information.

Then, Congress responded with public hearings and structural reforms. Today, many wonder whether the mechanisms of accountability still function—or whether secrecy, bureaucracy, and polarization have rendered them inert.

“The documents contain irrefutable evidence that details how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false.”

DNI Tulsi Gabbard

Heading for a Church Committee 2.0?

As revelations pile up and public trust in the intelligence community continues to erode, a growing chorus in Washington—and beyond—is calling for a new independent investigation modeled on the Church Committee of 1975.

Lawmakers across the political spectrum, civil liberties advocates, and former intelligence officials have begun to acknowledge what was once unthinkable: that the institutions designed to protect democracy may themselves require renewed oversight and structural reform.

Spearheading this new wave of scrutiny is Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, whose decision to declassify a cache of sensitive documents from the 2016–2017 period has reignited long-standing allegations that intelligence leaders shaped narratives around foreign election interference to serve domestic political ends.

The Justice Department has since launched a formal probe into possible FISA abuses and the broader question of intelligence “weaponization”—marking one of the most serious internal reckonings the intelligence community has faced in decades.

50 years ago, Frank Church warned the American people:

“I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency [CIA] and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return.”

But is Washington truly prepared to revisit the kind of sweeping inquiry last seen in 1975? A modern-day Church Committee would require bipartisan courage, institutional humility, and an unwavering commitment to transparency—qualities in short supply in today’s hyper-polarized political landscape.

Still, the stakes are undeniable: if left unexamined, the erosion of public trust in intelligence may become more damaging than any foreign threat.

“He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you.”

Friedrich Nietzsche
(Beyond Good and Evil)

REFERENCES

Gabbard declassifies new docs in latest push to cast doubt on Russia assessment — Politico

Justice Department to assess claims of ‘alleged weaponization’ of US intelligence community — Reuters

Speaking about ECHELON, Frank Church said:

“…[T]hat capability at any time could be turned around on the American people and no American would have any privacy left, such [is] the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide. If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back, because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know. Such is the capability of this technology … I don’t want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return.”

=

2025: The Year of Intelligence 2.0 ? [50 Years from the Church Committee to Russiagate Investigation]