Was PUTIN Name Redacted From Flynn FBI 302 Just Released? [UPDATE : Non-Redacted 302 Released]

“Investigators have learned that Mr. Flynn and Mr. Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, took the lead in those efforts. Mr. Mueller’s team has emails that show Mr. Flynn saying he would work to kill the vote [on UN Resolution 2334].”

New York Times (December 1, 2017)

December 20 2018 — In January 2017, two FBI agents interviewed the then US National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. On December 1 2017, Flynn pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI during that interview.

On December 17 2018, at the request of Judge Emmet Sullivan, the Special Counsel’s Office released a redacted version of their report — known as a FBI 302 — regarding this event. I believe that the word PUTIN was redacted in a key paragraph of that document. Follow us on Twitter: @INTEL_TODAY

RELATED POST: Russiagate — Former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn Charged Over False Statements to FBI

RELATED POST: RussiaGate — Adam Carter : “My Turn to Speak”

RELATED POST: Two Years Ago — CIA Playing the “Russia Card”. Again…

UPDATE (May 22 2020) — Three days after the Special Counsel’s Office released a redacted version of General Mike Flynn FD 302, I posted this analysis which is an attempt to guess two redacted words in a rather puzzling paragraph.

The curious sentence is:

“FLYNN heard through other channels that [REDACTED] did not like the vote, and believed the [REDACTED] of their own accord delayed the vote a day.”

How well did I do? Let us take it one step at the time. First, I suggested that the first redacted word was 5 characters-long while the second was 9 characters-long.

I had correctly estimated the number of characters of both redacted words.

This is good and it shows that the method I used and explained can be trusted in the future.

Second, knowing from this preliminary step that the second redacted word was 9 characters-long, the context of the discussion strongly suggested that the redacted word is: “Egyptians”.

And YES, I had correctly guessed the second word. It is indeed “Egyptians”.

Knowing that the first redacted word was 5 characters-long, I came to two conclusions.

Firstly, I rejected the then popular suggestion that the word was [Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-] SISI, because it is only 4 characters-long. I was correct.

Secondly, expecting that word to be the name of a person, [After all, only a person can like or not like!] I concluded that the first redacted word was: “PUTIN”.

I was WRONG. The first redacted word is not a person but a country.

And then, the answer is rather obvious. The word is EGYPT.

“FLYNN heard through other channels that Egypt did not like the vote, and believed the Egyptians of their own accord delayed the vote a day.”

I guess that I had expected that the FBI agents sent to  interview General Michael Flynn — a former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency and the then-national security adviser — would be able to write sentences far more precise and accurate, let alone grammatically correct. That was my mistake.

And I have no excuse. Not long ago, I told you that FBI agents appear unable to read, count and think logically.

RELATED POST: FBI — Do you have what it takes to be an Intelligence Analyst? [Parody] // UPDATE

It is also established they cannot even redact sensitive information.

RELATED POST: Three Years Ago — Former CIA Robert Baer: “We Deserve The Truth” [9/11 & The 28 Pages Report] UPDATE

And now, it is abundantly clear that they cannot even write a meaningful FD 302.

Lesson learned.

PS — I wish to thank NSA whistle-blower Thomas A. Drake (@Thomas_Drake1) and independent journalist & National Security expert Marcy Wheeler (@emptywheel) for sending me the non-redacted version of Mike Flynn FD 302.


On December 1 2017, General Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump’s ex-national security adviser, pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI in January 2017.

According to one of the charges against him, Flynn lied when he stated that, on December 22 2016,  he did not ask Russian ambassador Kislyak either to delay the vote [on UN Resolution 2334] or to defeat the pending United Nations Security Council Resolution.

On that day (Dec. 22 2017), the United Nations Security Council was about to vote on whether to condemn Israel’s building of settlements.

At the time, the Obama administration was preparing to allow a Security Council vote on the matter.

The vote was NOT delayed and UN Resolution 2334 passed 14-0 on December 23 2016, with the United States abstaining.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigators learned through witnesses and documents that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel had asked the Trump transition team to lobby other countries to help Israel.


December 22 2016— A “very senior” Trump transition team official [Jared Kushner] tells Michael Flynn to contact foreign governments including Russia to discuss a pending UN Security Council vote on Israeli settlements.

December 22 2016 — Mr Flynn urges Sergei Kislyak to vote against or delay the resolution

December 23 2016 — Mr Kislyak says Russia would not vote against such a resolution

December 23 2016 — 14 delegations  vote in favour of UN Resolution 2334 and United States abstains.

Document: Special Counsel Releases Flynn FD 302

At the request of Judge Emmet Sullivan, the Special Counsel’s Office has filed a redacted version of the report—known as an FD-302 or simply 302—produced by FBI agents following their January 2017 interview of then-National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.

Today, I will only comment on a single paragraph. (More, much more, at a later time. Tiny steps for tiny feet…)

Text Analysis

Fonts have 2 characteristics that will affect character spacing: width and kerning.

Kerning determines when two adjacent characters can overlap. For instance, when you write AT, the leftmost part of the T bar may actually be positioned LEFT of the lowest part of the right branch of the A.

Although fixed width fonts may allow kerning, it is rarely the case.

In Microsoft Word 2007 on Windows, Courier New is — as far as I can tell — a fixed-length, no kerning font. And it may very well be the font used by the FBI agents who wrote the FD 302.

There is a good reason for intelligence agencies to use this kind of monospace fonts.

The Guessing Game

I thus typed this section with that font (Courier New) and here is the result.

Historical Context

I believe that the second redacted word is almost certainly “Egyptians”. Why? Let us look at the historical context of this event.

“The draft was originally presented by Egypt on the basis of a document prepared by British legal and diplomatic figures working together with the Palestinians, with Britain regarded as the key player in formulating the resolution and pressing for a vote.

High pressures were exerted to avoid the vote.

On 22 December, United States President-elect Donald Trump called on Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi to withdraw the proposal, and Egypt withdrew the nomination after what its ambassador called an intense pressure.

Then on 23 December, the draft was taken up and proposed again by Malaysia, New Zealand, Senegal and Venezuela.

Following a telephone conversation between Netanyahu and Vladimir Putin, the Russian ambassador to the UN Vitaly Churkin requested that the vote be postponed until after Christmas. His proposal failed to gain any support.

The resolution was passed 14 to 0.

All members voted for the resolution except for the United States, which abstained.” [Wikipedia]

Considering the context, and the fact that the redacted word is 9 letters long, it is highly likely that the word is indeed Egyptians.

But, what is the first redacted word?

Many people have assumed that it was SISI [Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi ]. It certainly sounds plausible.

Actually, until I worked out — as explained above —  the exact spacing (and type of font used), I had also assumed that it was indeed the correct answer.

However, unless I made a mistake, the first redacted word is five letters long.

And the context strongly suggests that the word is: “PUTIN”.

“Flynn heard through other channels” certainly means that he did not learn the information from Kislyak… and therefore almost certainly refers to a Russian key politician. Would you agree?

Why on earth was the word PUTIN redacted?


Trump-Russia: Michael Flynn charged over false statements to FBI — BBC (Dec 1 2017)

United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334 — Wikipedia

United Nations Security Council resolution — Wikipedia

The Black Holes in the Mike Flynn 302: The Back Channel Discussion May Be Most Sensitive Investigative Detail — Emptywheel

Monospaced font — Wikipedia


Was PUTIN Name Redacted from Flynn FBI 302 Just Released?

Was PUTIN Name Redacted From Flynn FBI 302 Just Released? [UPDATE : Non Redacted 302 Released]

This entry was posted in General Mike Flynn, Putin, Russiagate and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s